2.0 : WRF netcdf / CTL

[Patrick Reuter]

Hi,

when using 'set mpdset hires', I have the same problem.

Please still consider my question.

Cheers,
    Patrick

Matt Alonso <matt.alonso at GMAIL.COM> a écrit :

> Sorry about that everyone.  Anyway, where was I?
>
> I could be way off here but did you see if you are using the "hi-res" map:
>
> set mpdset hires
>
> This has typically resolved issues for me where the map and data topography
> look like this.  Also for WRF related questions perhaps you should try the
> WRF User's Forum:
>
> http://tornado.meso.com/wrf_forum/
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
>
>> On Feb 2, 2008 11:38 AM, Patrick Reuter <preuter at labri.fr> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > thank you for providing GraDS 2.0, it's really cool to open NetCDF
>> > files directly.
>> >
>> > However, I have a problem to configure the CTL file correctly for the
>> > lambert projection (I think PDEF is the issue).
>> >
>> > Here is my CTL file :
>> >
>> > dset ^file.nc
>> > dtype netcdf
>> > undef -888
>> > TITLE WRF Output Grid: Time, bottom_top, south_north, west_east
>> > pdef 48 46 LCCR 46.6 1.1 24.5 23.5 46.6 46.6 1.1 27000 27000
>> > xdef 48 linear -6.422363 0.319
>> > ydef 46 linear  40.87268 0.24
>> > zdef  27 linear 1 1
>> > tdef   2000 linear 29jan2008 30mn
>> > vars 1
>> > LANDMASK=>l     0  t,y,x    landmask
>> > endvars
>> >
>> > Here is my namelist.wps to configure the area of interest for my WRF
>> > model :
>> >
>> > &geogrid
>> >  parent_id         = 1,
>> >  parent_grid_ratio = 1,
>> >  i_parent_start    = 1,
>> >  j_parent_start    = 1,
>> >  e_we          = 49,
>> >  e_sn          = 47,
>> >  geog_data_res = '2m',
>> >  dx = 27000,
>> >  dy = 27000,
>> >  map_proj =  'lambert',
>> >  ref_lat   = 46.6,
>> >  ref_lon   = 1.1,
>> >  truelat1  = 46.6,
>> >  truelat2  = 46.6,
>> >  stand_lon = 1.1,
>> >  geog_data_path = '/mnt/scratch/meteo/geog',
>> > /
>> >  ref_x = 24.5,
>> >  ref_y = 23.5,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, the landmask from the WRF output does not coincide with
>> > the Grads Map - a serious problem for me, evidently !  Please see the
>> > image illustrating my problem (it's only 20KB).
>> >
>> > Could anybody tell me if I am in the wrong direction ?
>> >
>> > I would appreciate your help. It is so hard to find someone with some
>> > WRF and GrADS experience to talk to.
>> >
>> > Have a nice day !
>> >   Patrick
>> >
>> >
>>
>