<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:49 PM, James T. Potemra <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jimp@hawaii.edu">jimp@hawaii.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi Arlindo:<br>
<br>
I emailed last week about having a problem reading in a netCDF file with<br>
grads-2.0.a5.oga.4, specifically the netCDF :title was too long (more than<br>
256 characters). The files are now within this limit, and grads-2.0.a5.oga<br>
reads them okay. However, the same data set is served via OPeNDAP and<br>
the same grads binary does not work. I'm not sure I understand the error<br>
list (see below) but I suspect a similar issue. I've tried<br>
grads-1.9.0-rc1 and<br>
it works fine. I've attached the netCDF file as an example<br>
(<a href="http://ns01_2009_04_21.nc" target="_blank">ns01_2009_04_21.nc</a>).<br>
Again, grads-1.9.0-rc1 can read both the local and OPeNDAP data set;</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is this a i686 or x86_64 version?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
grads-2.0.a5.oga.5 can now read the local one but not the OPeNDAP one.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Here is what I found out: I can read your opendap just fine with my v2.0.a5.oga.5 binaries for Mac OS X and Linux/i686, but it fails for the x86_64 binary. There is a problem somewhere, needs debugging.</div>
<div><br></div><div>1) Could you please try Jennifer's x86_64 gradsdap binary (from COLA's site) and let me know whether it has the same problem? </div><div><br></div><div>2) In the meantime, can you try the Linux/i686 binaries? They should work just fine on a x86_64 box.</div>
<div><br></div><div> We should be able to figure this out. The x86_64 binaries have a been a bit tricky because of the different integer sizes. </div><div><br></div><div> Arlindo</div></div><br>-- <br>Arlindo da Silva<br>
<a href="mailto:dasilva@alum.mit.edu">dasilva@alum.mit.edu</a><br>