<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16609" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi Arlindo,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Option 1 & 2 both failed with segmentation
fault on sdfopen.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Steven</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=dasilva@ALUM.MIT.EDU href="mailto:dasilva@ALUM.MIT.EDU">Arlindo da
Silva</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=GRADSUSR@LIST.CINECA.IT
href="mailto:GRADSUSR@LIST.CINECA.IT">GRADSUSR@LIST.CINECA.IT</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, February 24, 2008 8:35
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Build Grads with dods
1.9.0-rc1 on Suse 10.3</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Steven Weiss <<A
href="mailto:sweiss@iafrica.com">sweiss@iafrica.com</A>> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<DIV bgcolor="#ffffff">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi Arlindo,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>See below for details as requested. I have not
not tried the pre-compiled versions of supplibs. Actually, I have been
working in a windows test environment with grads 1.8 and gradsdods/lats4d.
When I wanted to deploy, I downloaded grads-bin-1.8sl11-linux.tar.gz which
gave me segmentation faults when trying to do sdfopen. A little homework in
the userlist archives indicated that 1.9 is more stable and I decided to
build from source thinking this would be the way to go to avoid
problems.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>One would think so, but with all the dependencies and
platforms building is always full of surprises. If you don't mind
using binaries that someone else compiled, here is what I'd suggest:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1) If the i686 grads b1.9.0-rc1 binaries work for you I'd stick with
that. (The fact that the 1.8SL11 coredumps is because it was built with a very
old version of g++/glibc, usually the main cause of binary
incompatibility.)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2) If 1) fails, then I'd do a semi-binary approach: binary supplibs,
grads from sources, A couple of users had to resort to this because of a
glibc incompatibility. The supplibs are all compiled statically, so they are
pretty reusable across distributuons with gcc 3 and newer. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3) and if 1)/2) fails I'd try both supplibs/grads from sources. I am yet
to hear from someone that had to to this because 2 failed. It could happen,
though.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Let me know what you would like to do. If you would like to stick with 3)
then I'll devise a strategy to debug the supplibs build on Suse 10.3.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> Arlindo.</DIV>
<DIV><BR>-- <BR>Arlindo da Silva<BR><A
href="mailto:dasilva@alum.mit.edu">dasilva@alum.mit.edu</A>
</DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>