Sorry about that everyone. Anyway, where was I?<br><br>I could be way off here but did you see if you are using the "hi-res" map:<br><br>set mpdset hires<br><br>This has typically resolved issues for me where the map and data topography look like this. Also for WRF related questions perhaps you should try the WRF User's Forum:<br>
<br><a href="http://tornado.meso.com/wrf_forum/">http://tornado.meso.com/wrf_forum/</a><br><br>Cheers,<br>Matt<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 2, 2008 11:38 AM, Patrick Reuter <<a href="mailto:preuter@labri.fr" target="_blank">preuter@labri.fr</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi everybody,<br><br>thank you for providing GraDS 2.0, it's really cool to open NetCDF<br>files directly.<br><br>However, I have a problem to configure the CTL file correctly for the<br>lambert projection (I think PDEF is the issue).<br>
<br>Here is my CTL file :<br><br>dset ^<a href="http://file.nc" target="_blank">file.nc</a><br>dtype netcdf<br>undef -888<br>TITLE WRF Output Grid: Time, bottom_top, south_north, west_east<br>pdef 48 46 LCCR 46.6 1.1 24.5 23.5 46.6 46.6 1.1 27000 27000<br>
xdef 48 linear -6.422363 0.319<br>ydef 46 linear 40.87268 0.24<br>zdef 27 linear 1 1<br>tdef 2000 linear 29jan2008 30mn<br>vars 1<br>LANDMASK=>l 0 t,y,x landmask<br>endvars<br><br>Here is my namelist.wps to configure the area of interest for my WRF model :<br>
<br>&geogrid<br> parent_id = 1,<br> parent_grid_ratio = 1,<br> i_parent_start = 1,<br> j_parent_start = 1,<br> e_we = 49,<br> e_sn = 47,<br> geog_data_res = '2m',<br> dx = 27000,<br>
dy = 27000,<br> map_proj = 'lambert',<br> ref_lat = 46.6,<br> ref_lon = 1.1,<br> truelat1 = 46.6,<br> truelat2 = 46.6,<br> stand_lon = 1.1,<br> geog_data_path = '/mnt/scratch/meteo/geog',<br>
/<br> ref_x = 24.5,<br> ref_y = 23.5,<br><br>Unfortunately, the landmask from the WRF output does not coincide with<br>the Grads Map - a serious problem for me, evidently ! Please see the<br>image illustrating my problem (it's only 20KB).<br>
<br>Could anybody tell me if I am in the wrong direction ?<br><br>I would appreciate your help. It is so hard to find someone with some<br>WRF and GrADS experience to talk to.<br><br>Have a nice day !<br><font color="#888888"> Patrick<br>
<br></font></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote><br></div><br>