[gradsusr] GFS total cloud cover

[Jeff Duda]

Sam,
That might just be a wgrib table thing. Have you actually plotted the field
over those times? If it's truly an averaged field, you should be able to
see some indication of that in the texture and smoothness of the fields as
you progress through increasing averaged times.

My guess is that this is just some arbitrary setting in wgrib and does not
reflect the true nature of the field. But I could be wrong. If there are
any NCEP folks who work on the GFS on this forum, perhaps one of them could
set the record straight.

Jeff

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Sam Wilson <sam at surfline.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the response Jeff - it’s strange to me as well!
>
> Running wgrib2 on the data files for forecast hours 001 through 007 gives
> the following for TCDCclm:
>
> *f001:*
> 17:7991683:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*0-1* hour ave fcst:
> *f002:*
> 17:8082626:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*0-2* hour ave fcst:
> *f003:*
> 17:8059826:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*0-3 *hour ave fcst:
> *f004:*
> 17:8057865:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*0-4* hour ave fcst:
> *f005:*
> 17:8119289:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*0-5* hour ave fcst:
> *f006:*
> 17:8172510:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*0-6* hour ave fcst:
> *f007:*
> 17:8013825:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*6-7* hour ave fcst:
>
> And it continues on..once the files go to 3 hourly (after hour 120), we
> have:
>
> *f123:*
> 17:7687687:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*120-123* hour ave fcst:
> *f126:*
> 17:7778871:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*120-126* hour ave fcst:
> *f129:*
> 17:7728042:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*126-129* hour ave fcst:
>
> And finally the 12 hourly files (past hour 240) are all just 12 hour
> average forecasts:
>
> *f252:*
> 17:6845416:d=2016110212:TCDC:entire atmosphere:*240-252* hour ave fcst:
>
> I did think about the method you suggested (tcdcclm - tcdcclm(t-1)) but
> stopped there for the reason you mentioned..
>
> Strange indeed - unless I’m missing something..
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
>
> From: <gradsusr-bounces at gradsusr.org> on behalf of Jeff Duda <
> jeffduda319 at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: GrADS Users Forum <gradsusr at gradsusr.org>
> Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 2:08 PM
> To: GrADS Users Forum <gradsusr at gradsusr.org>
> Subject: Re: [gradsusr] GFS total cloud cover
>
> It seems a little strange to me that the total cloud cover product would
> be averaged over time. Is that really the case?
>
> Anyway, if you really do have an average over overlapping and increasing
> windows, with nothing else to go on and without applying the equations of
> motion in reverse, you'd have to assume a linear averaging, so subtraction
> of subsequent slices of the field (i.e., tcdcclm - tcdcclm(t-1)) would give
> you piecewise temporal averages. However, that method would give you
> negative cloud cover values which is clearly nonsensical, which again is
> why I question whether or not that array contains a temporal average. That
> just doesn't make a lot of sense.
>
> Jeff Duda
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sam Wilson <sam at surfline.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’m working with hourly GFS total cloud cover (TCDCclm) and I’m a bit
>> stumped on the following..
>>
>> Given TCDCclm for hours 0-1, 0-2, 0-3, 0-4, 0-5, and 0-6, what is the
>> proper way to determine TCDCclm for hours 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, and 5-6?
>>
>> I may be making the problem more difficult than it is..but wanted to ping
>> this group to be sure.
>>
>> Is there an existing grads script that handles this already and if not,
>> does anyone here have any insight?
>>
>> Thanks so much for your time.
>>
>> Best,
>> Sam
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gradsusr mailing list
>> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
>> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Duda
> Post-doctoral research associate
> University of Oklahoma School of Meteorology
>
> _______________________________________________
> gradsusr mailing list
> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
>
>


-- 
Jeff Duda
Post-doctoral research associate
University of Oklahoma School of Meteorology
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gradsusr.org/pipermail/gradsusr/attachments/20161102/1ed436f7/attachment.html