[gradsusr] Setting missing values (or any value) to undefined
Jeff Duda
jeffduda319 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 30 14:06:20 EDT 2015
To my knowledge, no.
I am perplexed as to why my proposed solution did not work. Is there any
chance you can let me poke around the data myself to see what's up? If not,
can I see the control file and commands you used?
Jeff
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Matt Bunkers - WFO UNR <
matthew.bunkers at noaa.gov> wrote:
> Setting the UNDEF variable in the ctl file worked for me. Still, I wonder
> if more than one UNDEF variable can be defined.
>
> -- Matt
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Matt Bunkers - WFO UNR <
> matthew.bunkers at noaa.gov> wrote:
>
>> The maskout(WC,WC+119.9) option didn't work. I've tried playing with
>> different numbers but still get weird gradients.
>>
>> Can I include more than one value for the UNDEF variable in the ctl
>> file? The documentation doesn't suggest so.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- Matt
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Goodson,Ron [Edm] <Ron.Goodson at ec.gc.ca
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> If this is the only data being analyzed .. then wouldn’t just setting
>>> UNDEF in the ctl file be even easier (though I’ll admit the maskout is way
>>> more flexible and necessary if you have a bunch of different variables that
>>> each use different missing values).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* gradsusr-bounces at gradsusr.org [mailto:
>>> gradsusr-bounces at gradsusr.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Duda
>>> *Sent:* October 30, 2015 9:46 AM
>>> *To:* GrADS Users Forum
>>> *Subject:* Re: [gradsusr] Setting missing values (or any value) to
>>> undefined
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> maskout(WC,WC+119.9)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Matt Bunkers - WFO UNR <
>>> matthew.bunkers at noaa.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have hourly wind chill (WC) grids for which I want to find the minimum
>>> WC. The problem I have is that some of the areas of the grids are missing
>>> (set to -120). When I compute the minimum WC and then display the result
>>> (as either image or contour) I get huge gradients between the real data and
>>> the missing data. What I would like to do is set my missing data to
>>> undefined (so they don't plot). I've tried that with the const function
>>> but that doesn't appear to work. Is there another function that would
>>> allow me to set a given value (-120 in this case) of my grid to undefined?
>>> If it is set to undefined then when I plot the grid I shouldn't see those
>>> horrendous gradients.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gradsusr mailing list
>>> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
>>> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Jeff Duda
>>> Graduate research assistant
>>> University of Oklahoma School of Meteorology
>>> Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gradsusr mailing list
>>> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
>>> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gradsusr mailing list
> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
>
>
--
Jeff Duda
Graduate research assistant
University of Oklahoma School of Meteorology
Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gradsusr.org/pipermail/gradsusr/attachments/20151030/816cc62e/attachment.html
More information about the gradsusr
mailing list