[gradsusr] differen behaviour of STID in grads 1 and 2
Jennifer Adams
jma at cola.iges.org
Tue Nov 8 08:13:15 EST 2011
Ciao, Davide --
The undef handling is completely different in 1.9 and 2.0, so it is not too surprising that you are seeing this behavior. I would suggest trying to use the const() function with the -u option to change the undefs into something valid.
--Jennifer
On Nov 8, 2011, at 6:52 AM, Davide Sacchetti wrote:
> dears,
> if you open a station data and set:
>
> SET STID ON
>
> * using grads 1.9.0-rc1 you see all valid values and all STIDs
> (stids related to any value, also if value is UNDEF)
> * using 2.0.1 you see STIDs only if values are not UNDEF
>
> is it there any control to avoid this? (I'd like to see STIDs also for
> undefined values)
>
> in attacch. you can visualize this difference. In the example national
> municipalities names are used as STIDs, values are set to UNDEF
>
>
> thanks in advance
> bye bye
> Davide
>
> --
> --> Attenzione cambio indirizzo: davide.sacchetti at arpal.gov.it
> --
> Davide Sacchetti
> Centro Funzionale Meteo Idrologico di Protezione Civile della Regione Liguria
> ARPAL Unità Tecnica Complessa di livello Regionale
> V.le Brigare Partigiane 2 16121 Genova (I)
> tel: +39 010 6437535 fax: +39 010 6437520
> mail: davide.sacchetti at arpal.gov.it web: www.meteoliguria.it
> <Screenshot.png>_______________________________________________
> gradsusr mailing list
> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
--
Jennifer M. Adams
IGES/COLA
4041 Powder Mill Road, Suite 302
Calverton, MD 20705
jma at cola.iges.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gradsusr.org/pipermail/gradsusr/attachments/20111108/92e7ff99/attachment-0003.html
More information about the gradsusr
mailing list