[gradsusr] differen behaviour of STID in grads 1 and 2

Jennifer Adams jma at cola.iges.org
Tue Nov 8 08:13:15 EST 2011


Ciao, Davide -- 
The undef handling is completely different in 1.9 and 2.0, so it is not too surprising that you are seeing this behavior. I would suggest trying to use the const() function with the -u option to change the undefs into something valid. 
--Jennifer

On Nov 8, 2011, at 6:52 AM, Davide Sacchetti wrote:

> dears,
> if you open a station data and set:
> 
> SET STID ON
> 
>      * using grads 1.9.0-rc1 you see all valid values and all STIDs
>        (stids related to any value, also if value is UNDEF)
>      * using 2.0.1 you see STIDs only if values are not UNDEF
> 
> is it there any control to avoid this? (I'd like to see STIDs also for
> undefined values)
> 
> in attacch. you can visualize this difference. In the example national
> municipalities names are used as STIDs, values are set to UNDEF
> 
> 
> thanks in advance
> bye bye
> Davide
> 
> -- 
> --> Attenzione cambio indirizzo: davide.sacchetti at arpal.gov.it
> --
> Davide Sacchetti
> Centro Funzionale Meteo Idrologico di Protezione Civile della Regione Liguria
> ARPAL Unità Tecnica Complessa di livello Regionale
> V.le Brigare Partigiane 2 16121 Genova (I)
> tel: +39 010 6437535                    fax: +39 010 6437520
> mail: davide.sacchetti at arpal.gov.it     web: www.meteoliguria.it
> <Screenshot.png>_______________________________________________
> gradsusr mailing list
> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr

--
Jennifer M. Adams
IGES/COLA
4041 Powder Mill Road, Suite 302
Calverton, MD 20705
jma at cola.iges.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gradsusr.org/pipermail/gradsusr/attachments/20111108/92e7ff99/attachment-0003.html 


More information about the gradsusr mailing list