[gradsusr] Grads computation speed

[Jonas Kaufmann]

Hello,

which one should be faster then, grib1 or grib2? Does the projection
of the file have an influence on the computation speed?

Best regards,
Jonas Kaufmann

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 15:20, JPB <info at a-conseil.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there is a big difference in computation time between grib1 and grib2
> when using grads. Perhaps you have to look at the grib file types...
>
> regards,
> JPB
>
> Le 21 mai 10 à 15:16, Jonas Kaufmann a écrit :
>
>> Hello Michael,
>>
>> I tried on two machines with the same results. One is running Grads
>> Version 2.0.a1.oga.1, the other one is OpenGrads Version 2.0.a7.oga.3.
>> In both cases using the new version of my model was significantly
>> slower than the old one.
>>
>> The old model used ARWpost as WRF postprocessor, the new one uses
>> wrfpost. Both outputs are only customized in terms of available fields
>> in the Grib file, all other options should be the default ones.
>>
>> Thank you for your help!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jonas Kaufmann
>>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 15:09, Michael Fiorino <michael.fiorino at noaa.gov
>> > wrote:
>>> Jonas, you need to tell us the version of grads...  so the old data
>>> is
>>> binary and the new data grib? ciao mike
>>>
>>> On 5/21/10 11:42 AM, Jonas Kaufmann wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I just ran into a problem regarding Grads computation speed. I have
>>>> set up a WRF model over Europe and extract surface parameters for
>>>> about 4-5000 points in the model for 72 timesteps. Now I tried
>>>> another
>>>> WRF version which produces different output files, and the
>>>> computation
>>>> speed for my Grads tasks for the new model is much much slower than
>>>> before. You can find the first lines of my control files below.
>>>>
>>>> Using my old model, I could run my complete Grads tasks in about 90
>>>> minutes. Using the new setup, this takes forever to complete (had to
>>>> skip this as it took too long, think it should be around 180 minutes
>>>> or so), of course on the same machine. The main difference must be
>>>> in
>>>> the Gribfiles I am using.
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone explain why this might be happening? Which Gribfile
>>>> settings (version, projection etc.) are the best usable ones for
>>>> Grads? And finally: how can I improve computation speed for my new
>>>> model?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your answer!
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Jonas Kaufmann
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Old model:
>>>> options  byteswapped
>>>> pdef  161 146 lcc  47.300    9.800   81.000   73.500  47.30000
>>>> 47.30000    9.80000  21000.000  21000.000
>>>> xdef  626 linear  -19.84533   0.09459461
>>>> ydef  324 linear   31.13766   0.09459461
>>>> zdef   27 linear 1 1
>>>> tdef   88 linear 21Z26MAY2009      60MN
>>>> VARS   14
>>>>
>>>> New model:
>>>> dtype grib 255
>>>> pdef 265 211 lccr 31.202000 -10.532000 1 1 47.515000 47.515000
>>>> 10.025000 14684 14768
>>>> xdef 265 linear -10.532000 0.156066529170106
>>>> ydef 211 linear 31.202000 0.134254545454545
>>>> tdef 1 linear 00Z24may2010 1mo
>>>> zdef 1 linear 1 1
>>>> vars 16
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gradsusr mailing list
>>>> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
>>>> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gradsusr mailing list
>> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
>> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gradsusr mailing list
> gradsusr at gradsusr.org
> http://gradsusr.org/mailman/listinfo/gradsusr
>