user defined extensions installing problems

[Teerth Absit]

Arlindo,

Yes, I can confirm that i am using gradsv2 (from downloaded from cola site)
on solaries 2.10.

Thanks!
Xiaofeng


On 3/5/08, Arlindo da Silva <dasilva at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>  On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Don Hooper <hoop at colorado.edu> wrote:
>
> > Arlindo,
> >
> > > Hoop: is there any difference between the xlibs you used for the
> >
> > > v1.9.0-rc1build and the v2.0 build?
> > I was surprised to learn there is a difference, though I was not
> > conscious of it.  Here are the X11 dynamic dependencies for v1.9.0-rc1:
> >
> >        libXext.so.6.3 =>        /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.3
> >        libXpm.so.4.10 =>        /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4.10
> >        libXmu.so.6.0 =>         /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6.0
> >        libXt.so.6.0 =>  /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0
> >        libSM.so.6.0 =>  /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6.0
> >        libICE.so.6.3 =>         /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3
> >        libX11.so.6.1 =>         /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6.1
> >
> > My 2.0 build only needs the first and the last one; the rest
> > don't appear for that one.
> >
>
>
> This is strange. The user says that he can run v2 just fine, but when
> trying v1.9.0-rc1 he gets the following error message:
>
>
>  ***
> >./gradsnc
> ld.so.1: gradsnc: fatal: libXext.so.6.3: open failed: No such file or
> directory
> Killed
> ***
>
>
> Since libXext.so.6.3 is used in both builds I don't understand how this is
> possible.
>
> Xiaofeng: can you confirm?
>
>          Arlindo
>
> --
> Arlindo da Silva
> dasilva at alum.mit.edu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gradsusr.org/pipermail/gradsusr/attachments/20080307/50011fe9/attachment.html